Jakarta-aswinnews.com – The 30.16-kilometer sea fencing along the coast of Tangerang Regency, Banten, has sparked intense discussions regarding marine spatial governance, ecological sustainability, and its impacts on coastal communities.
Maritime observer from the Ikatan Alumni Lemhannas Strategic Center (ISC), Dr. Capt. Marcellus Hakeng Jayawibawa, S.SiT., M.H., M.Mar., highlighted that this action not only risks legal violations but also reveals the complexity of conflicts of interest between public and private sectors in coastal area management.
“The sea is a public resource that should be managed to support the welfare of all communities. This fencing reflects a lack of understanding of this principle,” said Capt. Hakeng in a press statement in Jakarta on Thursday, January 9, 2025.
Legal Violations
Legally, this sea fencing is considered to violate several regulations, including:
Law No. 27 of 2007 on the Management of Coastal Areas and Small Islands.
Minister of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Regulation No. 31 of 2021 on Marine Spatial Planning.
According to Capt. Hakeng, these violations indicate weak oversight and law enforcement, as well as a lack of awareness about the importance of sustainable marine resource management.
Ecological Damage
In addition to violating the law, the sea fencing also causes ecological harm. The structures made of bamboo, netting, and sand weights disrupt marine habitats, reduce biodiversity, and affect vital water flow essential for coastal ecosystems.
“The sea is a critical element for ecology, providing habitats for various species and maintaining environmental balance. Such fencing risks disturbing the sustainability of ecosystems and fisheries productivity,” he added.
Social and Economic Impact on Fishermen
From a social perspective, the sea fencing creates injustice for coastal communities, particularly traditional fishermen. Around 3,888 fishermen and 502 fish farmers in the area now have to travel further to catch fish, leading to increased operational costs and reduced productivity.
“This fencing not only limits fishermen’s access to marine resources but also threatens the overall economic sustainability of coastal communities,” explained Capt. Hakeng.
Opaque Governance
Capt. Hakeng also noted that this case reflects a lack of clarity in the governance of marine space projects. Joint investigations by various agencies have yet to identify the ultimate purpose of the fencing. If this is related to reclamation plans, the process should be carried out with full transparency and accountability.
“The government must ensure that every reclamation process complies with ecological standards and involves community participation and relevant experts to minimize environmental impacts,” he emphasized.
Solutions for the Future
This case highlights the importance of strengthening marine spatial governance focused on sustainability, equity, and welfare. Local community participation must be an integral part of any marine management policy.
“The sea is not only an economic resource but also an identity and part of the nation’s sustainability. By adopting a legal, ecological, and social approach, Indonesia can ensure that its marine wealth benefits all layers of society sustainably,” concluded Capt. Hakeng.
Red
